Here’s how the Documentation project answered my question.

From https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation on the lower left.

Frequently Asked Questions
        • General Questions
        • Installing OpenOffice.org
        • Working with Text Documents (Writer)
        • Working with Spreadsheets (Calc)
        • Working with Drawings (Draw)
        • Working with Presentations (Impress)
        • Working with Formulae (Math)
        • Working with Databases (Base)
        • Macros



> On Nov 17, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 17, 2020, at 11:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>> Am 17.11.20 um 20:21 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 17, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] 
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 7:48 PM
>>>>> To: dev
>>>>> Subject: Application Start Page Question
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve always wondered why the Start page of the Application 
>>>>> does not match our names for the various components of the Suite?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Writer is Text Document
>>>>> Calc is Spreadsheet
>>>>> Impress is Presentation
>>>>> Draw is Drawing
>>>>> Base is Database
>>>>> Math is Formula
>>>>> 
>>>>> The “New” menu has the same on the drop down.
>>>>> I’m not suggestion change.
>>>> But as far as "New" is concerned, the menu is completely called File-New 
>>>> (and not Window-New) and I find a new file is e.g. a text document. 
>>>> "Writer" would be the term for a new Writer window, but that would not 
>>>> correspond to the name of the menu.
>>>> This is a possible explanation of the menu, not an explicit defense of the 
>>>> menu.
>>> Application Window vs. Document type is a good explanation. Thank you.
>> 
>> That's also the reason why you see icons for the document type and not
>> for the application.
>> 
>> I always found it logical to choose "Text Document", when I wanted to
>> create a text document. ;-)
> 
> And on www.openoffice.org/product we have icons next to:
> - [Writer](writer.html "Wordprocessor") a word processor you can use for
>    anything from writing a quick letter to producing an entire book.
>  - [Calc](calc.html "Spreadsheet") a powerful spreadsheet with all the tools
>    you need to calculate, analyze, and present your data in numerical reports
>    or sizzling graphics.
>  - [Impress](impress.html "Presentation program") the fastest, most powerful
>    way to create effective multimedia presentations.
>  - [Draw](draw.html "Vector drawing tool") lets you produce everything from
>    simple diagrams to dynamic 3D illustrations.
>  - [Base](base.html "Database") lets you manipulate databases seamlessly.
>    Create and modify tables, forms, queries, and reports, all from within
>    Apache OpenOffice.
>  - [Math](math.html "Mathematical function creator") lets you create
>    mathematical equations with a graphic user interface or by directly typing
>    your formulas into the equation editor.
> It looks like these descriptions need some editing to more consistently tie 
> the document type with the window type.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>   Matthias
>> 
>>> 
>>>> I've read that you don't suggest any changes, but I'd like to point out: 
>>>> please let's not spend time on menu changes, in LibreOffice the menu 
>>>> changes are an absolute nuisance, because you have to search all the time.
>>> Exactly! Such changes are Downgrades and certainly not an update or upgrade!
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Jörg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to