Hi - I had a follow up conversation with Infra.
We are discussing just using downloads.a.o without mirrors. We should just get a sense of the size by switching over either random requests or choosing a particular language. So, let’s say we change the de download page to use downloads.a.o! If all goes well, we switch over the others a few at a time. Keep in mind downloads only has current versions with older ones on archives.a.o All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 2, 2021, at 6:05 AM, Peter Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote: > > So is this Mirror system Issue a blocker? > > Infra expects us to say how much TB we will need per year as Download traffic. > > Is anyone able to answer this question? I mean by saying a number. > > If so please add it to the ticket. So the ticket can go to Infra and they > worry about the Mirror system distribution. It is not our job to do this. > > >> On 02.05.21 14:23, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17309317#comment-17309317 >> >> That is why I wrote "encourage again". ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> Am 02.05.21 um 14:18 schrieb DaveB: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> That would be nice, except very few (if any) of the ASF mirrors >>> (https://www.apache.org/mirrors/) mirror AOO. Maybe that is something we >>> can work with Intra to fix. >>> >>> Regards >>> Dave >>> >>> On 02/05/2021 12:22, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> I would rather encourage to use the ASF mirror system again as an >>>> addition to our SourceForge downloads. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>> Am 02.05.21 um 12:38 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In the past we have discouraged the use of >>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/ because of Infra. >>>>> >>>>> I had a discussion with Humbedooh if this is still the case. And the >>>>> discussion outcome is, hat they only need a view days to adjust in >>>>> order to be able to secure the service. >>>>> >>>>> It may be that on peak times the download speed drops, but traffic or >>>>> the amount of downloads is not a topic. >>>>> >>>>> A topic will be to obtain statistics. I have not discussed this yet. >>>>> But the data is not publicly available, and I so far obtained only a >>>>> list from last week, because I figured that some are already promoting >>>>> the link. >>>>> >>>>> (With about 6k of download on friday, 4k on thursday, and 500 on >>>>> wednseday. (thursday I figured that some sites announced 4.1.10. (They >>>>> even link the draft release notes :P ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So what do you think? Should we promote the alternate link with this >>>>> release more publicly maybe on Forums and go for a transition to a >>>>> different download policy? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> All the Best >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> > -- > This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
