Small addition.
I discussed volumes with Infra.
50k average downloads per day, with 140k peak (aktually I said 300k peak, and 
400mb)  and the response is it is fine.

The traffic seems to play only a role when we talk about the mirrors.

So next to be clear a full switch is not part of the discussion now. Just the 
move away from discouraging users, to use the site.

For a complete move we should look at mirrors and the template extention 
service, too. And solve both topics first.

All the best
Peter

Am 2. Mai 2021 20:05:15 MESZ schrieb Marcus <[email protected]>:
>Am 02.05.21 um 17:01 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> I had a follow up conversation with Infra.
>> 
>> We are discussing just using downloads.a.o without mirrors. We should
>just get a sense of the size by switching over either random requests
>or choosing a particular language.
>> 
>> So, let’s say we change the de download page to use downloads.a.o! If
>all goes well, we switch over the others a few at a time.
>> 
>> Keep in mind downloads only has current versions with older ones on
>archives.a.o
>
>we need a complete re-work of a.o.o/downloads when we want to seriously
>
>use this website for any downloads. Offering every file with an own
>link 
>is (hopefully !) not what we want. ;-)
>
>Of course here a step-by-step progress is needed. But at the end the
>ASF 
>dist system has to be strong enough for our download numbers (I've 
>attached them to the issue). When some non-ASF mirror server can
>support 
>with the load even better.
>
>Let's see what Infra will say.
>
>Marcus
>
>
>
>>> On May 2, 2021, at 6:05 AM, Peter Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> So is this Mirror system Issue a blocker?
>>>
>>> Infra expects us to say how much TB we will need per year as
>Download traffic.
>>>
>>> Is anyone able to answer this question? I mean by saying a number.
>>>
>>> If so please add it to the ticket. So the ticket can go to Infra and
>they worry about the Mirror system distribution. It is not our job to
>do this.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 02.05.21 14:23, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17309317#comment-17309317
>>>>
>>>> That is why I wrote "encourage again". ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>     Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> Am 02.05.21 um 14:18 schrieb DaveB:
>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be nice, except very few (if any) of the ASF mirrors
>>>>> (https://www.apache.org/mirrors/) mirror AOO. Maybe that is
>something we
>>>>> can work with Intra to fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/05/2021 12:22, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would rather encourage to use the ASF mirror system again as an
>>>>>> addition to our SourceForge downloads.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 02.05.21 um 12:38 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the past we have discouraged the use of
>>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/ because of Infra.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had a discussion with Humbedooh if this is still the case. And
>the
>>>>>>> discussion outcome is, hat they only need a view days to adjust
>in
>>>>>>> order to be able to secure the service.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may be that on peak times the download speed drops, but
>traffic or
>>>>>>> the amount of downloads is not a topic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A topic will be to obtain statistics. I have not discussed this
>yet.
>>>>>>> But the data is not publicly available, and I so far obtained
>only a
>>>>>>> list from last week, because I figured that some are already
>promoting
>>>>>>> the link.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (With about 6k of download on friday, 4k on thursday, and 500 on
>>>>>>> wednseday. (thursday I figured that some sites announced 4.1.10.
>(They
>>>>>>> even link the draft release notes :P )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what do you think? Should we promote the alternate link with
>this
>>>>>>> release more publicly maybe on Forums and go for a transition to
>a
>>>>>>> different download policy?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to