Jim Watson wrote: > On 31/10/2006, at 9:57 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > >> nobody asks for specs for bug fixes. Please give examples where a bug >> fix was not integrated because a spec was missing. > > at last...;) > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2977
This was an "enhancement", not a bugfix. If you read the issue you can see that it covered quite a lot of considerations. I don't know enough about Calc to estimate how big this enhancement was, but if it was more than trivial it might be necessary that it needs a spec. > In this case something different was specified and fixed, while the > bug persists at > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33851 And this one was even a "feature". I was talking about "bugs" (="defects"), sorry for being unclear. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
