Jim Watson wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2977
In this case something different was specified and fixed, while the bug
persists at
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33851
Are you saying it's a bad thing that there is a specification that
details what was done for 2.0? Would you prefer us saying "We've done
something about this issue, wait for the release to see what it was"?
Niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
