David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ...but I think there are still significant cases where using a wiki > is a much faster route for people (particularly outside > contributors) to use to collaboratively produce a specification. > Seconded. A wiki has a low barrier for entry, can cross-link/refer to/include verbatim other specs or documentation on the 'net, can be edited collaboratively - and, probably the biggest pro currently, can be searched in with whatever search engine you like.
What's more, a wiki more explicitely expresses the fact that a spec (or feature documentation - a lot of the things we're currently calling 'specs' are actually after-the-fact documentations) is never finished, but a living document. I'm all for this, and David and others have set an excellent example that it actually works. Just my 2 cents... -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
