Rüdiger Timm schrieb: > > Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Rüdiger Timm schrieb: >> >>> Caolan McNamara wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:54 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>>>> FYI: <http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=32> >>>> [...] >>> Second reason is that (curently) this does not fit our development >>> stile. We do childworkspaces feature wise. With the current degree of >>> code mudularity this quite often means to work on base (URE) modules >> ^^^ >> I hope that this is a typo and not a Freudian slip! :-) > > Typo :-) BTW, what's 'mudularity'? Sounds interesting, but I don't > know such word
Doesn't exist, but I hoped that it wasn't the word "mud" that was going around in your head and slipped into your fingers when you wanted to write "modularity". :-) > OK. If that's all, 'make it easy to build SDK and URE from scratch > independently from OOo', than I am fully with you. It should be possible > to check out just a needed subset of modules and build them. Without the > need to go through the whole tree just because you need > 'instsetoo_native'. But, that's only the first of four paragraphs > Stephan wrote concerning 'at build time'. Yes, I only presented my personal POV. For users and developers of OOo there wouldn't be much they could get from separated builds. That's clearly something for people that don't want to build OOo. So for me the ability to build and work on URE and ODK separately while still keeping the OOo build environment would be sufficient. Stephan's mileage may vary of course. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
