weekendadventure wrote:
Well, that might be different then. It is not what I had been told happened
with Ooo but if you are correct that might make a difference.
Please read http://about.openoffice.org/index.html for information about
the historical backgrounds,
So you are saying that they already owned the source and then released it
for opensource development? Even so, they could not claim ownership of code
developed by individuals who were not compensated. They may own the
original source but cannot claim ownership of the newer code unless they
compensate for the work.
Please see http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html for the
joint copyright assignment, also
http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html might answer some of
your questions,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
