Mi Michael,

Michael Meeks wrote (5-2-2008 17:30)
        Sure - so (it seems to me) rather hard for anyone except Sun to
prosecute an LGPL violation here - since it's quite possible that these
guys have a confidential agreement with Sun that makes it perfectly
legal for them to rip off people's code, and their customers, and get
away with it. How can we know that is not the case ? How can anyone be
sure if litigation was commenced, Sun wouldn't just settle for cash.

        One of the deep joys of the JCA with it's single steward.

Writing this like you do, reads to me as if you are actually suspecting Sun. Is there any clear reason why you do so, or why we should? If not, it is a more theoretical discussion, which could benefit from other wording, IMO.

Regards,
Cor

--

"The Year of 3" -2008- "Het jaar van 3"

Cor Nouws
Arnhem - Netherlands - nl.OpenOffice.org - marketing contact


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to