Hi, Frank (and thank you very much for the explanations),
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi T. J.,
I would *kill* for a little techno-babble here ...
Okay, I see your point here. I am still not convinced that transporting
the information via css.Exception.Message is the best idea ever, and
won't cause problems later on, but I definitely see your point.
And I see yours: you are worried that the proposed additions will
establish "squatter's rights" on the field, and be hard to evict, should
that become desirable in the future. A definite possibility.
.. But
logging is a longer-term enhancement,
No. Logging facilities are available, and the same script which produces
a "add file/line info to exceptions" patch could equally easily produce
a "add logger calls" patch.
Sounds wonderful, and should keep everybody happy. 3.0.2? 3.1? [ ;-)
ROFL ] /tj/
--
T. J. Frazier
Melbourne, FL
(TJFrazier on OO.o)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
