On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:38:18 +0100 Philipp Lohmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> The obvious optimization for that process would be leaving things as > they are and introduce an OSL_ASSERT_ABORT for those who really want > that. still one would need: - to get rid of DBG_ASSERT, because it makes absolutely no sense to have both DBG_ASSERT and OSL_ASSERT). - to move all the non-informal assertions up to OSL_ASSERT_ABORT. And Frank and Christian should be the first to do that for their assertions, if those are, as they claim, only reporting seriously messed up internal state unlike those chatty noncritical observations us other devs seem to use assertions for. BR, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
