Hi Björn, > As said before an aborting assertion should only be used for corrupt > internal state.
Well, to me that wasn't that clear 'til now. If we add "unrecoverable" before "corrupt" (and here we're back at the question of how an office suite should behave to the user in case of internal errors, a question which Christian and /me could never reach consensus about with Stephan), then what you say immediately implies that we need an additional assertion (OSL_ASSERT_ABORT?), simply because, as said before, existing assertions in their majority are used for things other than unrecoverable corrupt internal state. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [email protected] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
