On 2/12/10 3:05 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg
Germany wrote:
still one would need:
- to get rid of DBG_ASSERT, because it makes absolutely no sense to
have both DBG_ASSERT and OSL_ASSERT).
Feel free to do that in gsl. Anything that makes you happier ;-)
- to move all the non-informal assertions up to OSL_ASSERT_ABORT. And
Frank and Christian should be the first to do that for their
assertions, if those are, as they claim, only reporting seriously
messed up internal state unlike those chatty noncritical
observations us other devs seem to use assertions for.
Please note the "for those who really want that". Frank also didn't want
assertions to crash, so perhaps he actually doesn't want them to. But
anyway that would be up to him IMHO. No need for any "should be the
first" from you or me ;-)
Kind regards, pl
--
Sanity is just a bad excuse for a lack of imagination.
-- Author unknown
Registered Office: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551
Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Commercial register of the Local Court of Munich: HRB 161028
Managing Directors: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Martin Häring
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
