Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> JOSM should be a bit more stable, but I also don't like to wait 
> endless. JAVA6 will come end of month latest and JAVA5 users will 
> have to live with the version we have by then. Would be nice if the
> plugin issues and some other serious stuff can be fixed till then. If
> there are really bigger issues and users of JAVA5 have no other
> chance, then a bug-fix branch can be made if a maintainer for it can
> be found (which I doubt).
> 
> If we have a very stable version tomorrow, then JAVA6 can come friday
>  :-)

We are fixing bugs for 2 months now, so time can't be the issue. We have
to clearly identify the bugs that need to be fixed, then just do it and
move on. The new stuff is probably piling up in the local repositories,
this stagnation is quite annoying.

So i can partly understand why Karl pushed out [3102] but it introduced
a couple of bugs and there may be more to come. Do we really need this
right now?

And Dirk, you do the final decisions, so could you please be a little 
more verbose and clearly state what you think needs to be fixed? 
Especially if deadlines are missed, a status update wouldn't hurt.

Happy coding :)

__

Sebastian

_______________________________________________
josm-dev mailing list
josm-...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Reply via email to