On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:03 PM, SomeoneElse <[email protected]>wrote:
> This particular example is presumably just an accidental cockup, as > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/relation/1452380<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1452380>and > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/relation/1450360<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1450360>both > have the other one as an inner? Anything trying to parse that would > disappear up its own "inner relation". > > Hmm... http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1452380 has a single way member only, so it's not referencing the other relation. Anyway, I doubt it's a cockup, since the user added 7 inner relations, so it looks deliberate. I'm not sure how wide is this practice, I'm only working on a Vienna extract right now (where there's just that one super-multipolygon ;) ). Igor
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
