On 12 October 2012 00:58, Tom MacWright <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all (or, well, those subscribed to dev@ - my flamewar shields are at 50% > so I'm not risking an email to talk),
Bear in mind that technical (generally software) stuff is often better on dev@ anyway - and there's lots of developers on this list who aren't subscribed to the general flamewar^Wtalk@ list. > The three of these were closed by Tom Hughes, which is fine - they might be > all bad ideas, and if we're treating the issue tracker as "Stuff we all > agree is definitely good", then they don't belong there: they're relatively > undiscussed ideas, since I had just posted them. We have rails-dev@ was the place to discuss matters relating to the api/website, and here for matters with a wider impact. Does discussing new ideas on github bring advantages over mailing lists that I'm missing? It's not something that I'm used to. > What do you want to see happen with OSM's software this year? What are the > tasks which everyone agrees on, but nobody has had the time to tackle? Ah, good stuff. There's a lot of stuff on Potlatch2 that I'd like to see, but that I don't have time to work on. There's a junction editor that needs writing, an in-editor tutorial framework that needs finishing off, and a lot of half-done stuff in translations, UI and unit testing. I haven't seen anything specifically rulling it out, but would I be right in saying that mapbox don't have plans to contribute to P2? Beyond that, I'd like to see the issues around the deleted-item-map-call sorted out, and OWL (or equivalent) integrated into the rails port to power the history tab. As for all-new things, I'd like to explore how to integrate all the various QA feeds into a combined overview, rather than having to hunt around different sites. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
