>>>Gurkan, thanks for the great work! We thanks to all, not just me :)
>>>current OWB version is pretty stable Yes, but if we pass TCK fully that will be very cool! --Gurkan 2010/2/25 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > Gurkan, thanks for the great work! > > current OWB version is pretty stable (taking apart the bug in the javassist > library, which one can simply upgrade later by explicitly declaring a newer > version in a custom project instead of taking the default version one gets > as a transitive dependency. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> schrieb am Mi, 24.2.2010: > > > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> > > Betreff: TCK Report Before M4 > > An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Februar, 2010 20:39 Uhr > > Hello folks; > > > > I have been working on standalone TCK (standalone > > means that not running in container but includes EJB tests > > using OpenEJB) for a long time and decreased the number of > > failed tests considerably. Some of those failed tests are > > related with CDI-TCK bug and reported to CDI-TCK team. Some > > of them are not correctlyy implemented in OWB. I give the > > failed tests and their reasons why they have failed: > > > > I have so tired and I invite all of you to help me to > > pass it :) Working on TCK likes walking on spiny road. > > Please create a JIRA for any test you want to work on to > > pass it :) > > > > I have tested with the CDI-TCK 1.0.1-Final, and I have used > > TestNG plugin for Eclipse. > > > > Please do not commit big changes to current code base. I > > will start to release procedure by tomorrow evening maybe > > Saturday. > > > > Total Test: 582 > > Failed Test: 28 > > > > Thanks; > > > > --Gurkan > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.byname.duplicatePrefixResolution.DuplicateNamePrefixResolutionTest > > --> NOT IMPLEMENTED (EL Names) > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.typesafe.resolution.ResolutionByTypeTest > > --> I really do not understand. Sometimes work, sometimes > > not > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.byname.duplicateNameResolution.DuplicateNameResolutionTest > > -->NOT IMPLMENTED (EL Names) > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.circular.CircularDependencyTest > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.injectionpoint.InjectionPointTest > > --> InjectionPoint with Decorators delegate problem! > > > > <--OpenEJB Does not support beans without definining > > interface> > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.broken.singletonWithSessionScope.SingletonWithSessionScopeTest > > -->NOT CLient Interface > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.definition.EnterpriseBeanDefinitionTest > > -->NOT ClientInterface -->NOT CLient Interface > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.broken.singletonWithRequestScope.SingletonWithRequestScopeTest > > -->NOT CLient Interface > > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.dependent.DependentContextTest > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.enterpriseBeanWithNonPassivatingInjectedFieldInInterceptor.EnterpriseBeanWithNonPassivatingInjectedFieldInInterceptorTest > > --> EJB Interceptor Injections Not Supported > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingBeanConstructor.DecoratorWithNonPassivatingBeanConstructorTest > > --> Seems a bug in TCK > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInitializerMethod.DecoratorWithNonPassivatingInitializerMethodTest > > --> Seems a bug in TCK > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInjectedField.DecoratorWithNonPassivatingInjectedFieldTest--> > > Seems a bug in TCK > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.passivatingProducerMethodWithNonPassivatingParameter.PassivatingProducerMethodWithNonPassivatingParameterTest > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.event.observer.wildcardAndTypeVariable.ObserverMethodWithParametertizedTypeTest > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.beanManager.BeanManagerTest > > --> CDITCK-121 > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.invocation.DecoratorInvocationTest > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.resolution.DecoratorResolutionTest > > > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.simple.broken.extendejb.testSpecializingClassDirectlyExtendsEnterpriseBean > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.broken.directlyExtendsSimpleBean.DirectlyExtendsSimpleBeanTest > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.producer.method.ProducerMethodSpecializationTest > > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.simple.broken.extendejb.SpecializingBeanExtendsEnterpriseBeanTest > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr > > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye > > sizlere sunuyor! > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz > gegen Massenmails. > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
