any other opinion?
do we move to JULI directly?
- Romain
2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> no:
>
> private void wblLog(Level level, String messageKey)
> {
> if (logger.isLoggable(level))
> {
> logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
> Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(), messageKey);
> }
> }
>
> well if we move to natve JUL we'll need to keep a factory to allow
> subclasses to switch of implementation as cxf does.
>
> - Romain
>
>
>
> 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>
>> +1
>>
>> The getStackTrace only hits us if we throw an Exception, right? The
>> problem is that due to the additional wrapper handler we always have a
>> 'mismatch' in the StackTrace...
>>
>> I'm tempted to move to native jul anyway...
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:28 PM
>> > Subject: new logger api?
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
>> >
>> > any thought about it?
>> >
>> > the goal is mainly to allow to use something else than JUL. The proposed
>> > patch uses a system property but it can be something else.
>> >
>> > The other topic of this jira is the usage of getStackTrace() in the JUL
>> > implementation which is too costly IMO.
>> >
>> > - Romain
>> >
>>
>
>
