You still have nights ;-)

Was a joke, sorry.
JLouis

2012/6/25 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>

> gimme a few days plz, currently holding workshops the next 2 days.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >
> > Yes, that will make things simpler to integrate ;-)
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >
> >>  any other opinion?
> >>
> >>  do we move to JULI directly?
> >>
> >>  - Romain
> >>
> >>
> >>  2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>  > no:
> >>  >
> >>  > private void wblLog(Level level, String messageKey)
> >>  >     {
> >>  >         if (logger.isLoggable(level))
> >>  >         {
> >>  >             logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
> >>  > Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(),
> > messageKey);
> >>  >         }
> >>  >     }
> >>  >
> >>  > well if we move to natve JUL we'll need to keep a factory to allow
> >>  > subclasses to switch of implementation as cxf does.
> >>  >
> >>  > - Romain
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> >>  >
> >>  >> +1
> >>  >>
> >>  >> The getStackTrace only hits us if we throw an Exception, right?
> > The
> >>  >> problem is that due to the additional wrapper handler we always
> > have a
> >>  >> 'mismatch' in the StackTrace...
> >>  >>
> >>  >> I'm tempted to move to native jul anyway...
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >> LieGrue,
> >>  >> strub
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>  >> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >>  >> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  >> > Cc:
> >>  >> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:28 PM
> >>  >> > Subject: new logger api?
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > Hi,
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > any thought about it?
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > the goal is mainly to allow to use something else than JUL.
> > The
> >>  proposed
> >>  >> > patch uses a system property but it can be something else.
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > The other topic of this jira is the usage of getStackTrace()
> > in the
> >>  JUL
> >>  >> > implementation which is too costly IMO.
> >>  >> >
> >>  >> > - Romain
> >>  >> >
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to