gimme a few days plz, currently holding workshops the next 2 days.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:15 AM
> Subject: Re: new logger api?
>
> Yes, that will make things simpler to integrate ;-)
>
> JLouis
>
> 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>
>> any other opinion?
>>
>> do we move to JULI directly?
>>
>> - Romain
>>
>>
>> 2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > no:
>> >
>> > private void wblLog(Level level, String messageKey)
>> > {
>> > if (logger.isLoggable(level))
>> > {
>> > logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
>> > Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(),
> messageKey);
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > well if we move to natve JUL we'll need to keep a factory to allow
>> > subclasses to switch of implementation as cxf does.
>> >
>> > - Romain
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>> >
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> The getStackTrace only hits us if we throw an Exception, right?
> The
>> >> problem is that due to the additional wrapper handler we always
> have a
>> >> 'mismatch' in the StackTrace...
>> >>
>> >> I'm tempted to move to native jul anyway...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> >> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> >> > Cc:
>> >> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:28 PM
>> >> > Subject: new logger api?
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
>> >> >
>> >> > any thought about it?
>> >> >
>> >> > the goal is mainly to allow to use something else than JUL.
> The
>> proposed
>> >> > patch uses a system property but it can be something else.
>> >> >
>> >> > The other topic of this jira is the usage of getStackTrace()
> in the
>> JUL
>> >> > implementation which is too costly IMO.
>> >> >
>> >> > - Romain
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
