1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.





> On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> 
> Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> 
> 
> Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg" 
> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit :
> 
>>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
>> 
>>  Repo is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
>> 
>>  Source release is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>> 
>>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  [+1] let's ship it!
>>  [+0] meh, don't care
>>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>> 
>> 
>>  The VOTE is open for 72h
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Here is my +1
>> 
>>  txs and LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg 
> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>>  >
>>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place 
> where we
>>  >>  shouldn't.
>>  >>
>>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control 
> - that
>>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >>
>>  >>  LieGrue,
>>  >>  strub
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and 
> standalone)
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request 
> scopes
>>  it
>>  >>  is a
>>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be 
> fixed in
>>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl 
> doesn't
>>  >>  respect
>>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and 
> both
>>  > statements
>>  >>  > are very compatible).
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  >>  > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>  >>  > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress 
> Blog
>>  >>  > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>  >>  > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>  >>  > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | 
> Tomitriber
>>  >>  > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
>>  >>  > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
>>  > <gpetra...@apache.org>:
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
>>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest 
> (as soon as
>>  > owb
>>  >>  is
>>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  regards,
>>  >>  >>  gerhard
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
>>  > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
>>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>  >>  >>  > 
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
>>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
>>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
>>  >>  >>  > strub
>>  >>  >>  >
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >
>>  >>
>>  >
>> 
> 

Reply via email to