dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed
release numbers


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2016-09-01 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:

> 1.7.1 maybe. But we can easily kill 1.7.0 that from buildjob.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, 8:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Any way to not use 1.7.0? Repo(s) is already hosting it so no way to
> > validate it  until we make INFRA evicting the binaries.
> >
> > Would 1.7.0.1 ok?
> >
> >
> > Le 31 août 2016 22:51, "Mark Struberg"
> > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit :
> >
> >>  New take for OWB-1.7.0
> >>
> >>  Repo is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/
> >>
> >>  Source release is
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  orgapacheopenwebbeans-1018/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>
> >>  You gonna find the rest I'm sure :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>
> >>
> >>  The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Here is my +1
> >>
> >>  txs and LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > > 2016-08-31 22:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >>  >
> >>  >>  No, it's really that we ditch the ThreadLocals in a place
> > where we
> >>  >>  shouldn't.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  TCK passes even after my fix.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  > Shouldn't since the start object is broken in the context control
> > - that
> >>  > said we can move this over #deltaspike, doesn't affect OWB at all
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  LieGrue,
> >>  >>  strub
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016, 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  >>  > > FYI CDI TCK are green on tomee project (embedded and
> > standalone)
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > @Gerhard: if still the same issue related to session/request
> > scopes
> >>  it
> >>  >>  is a
> >>  >>  > bug of CdiCtrl API more than an OWB one so can (should) be
> > fixed in
> >>  >>  > deltaspike not there (note that OpenWebBeansContextControl
> > doesn't
> >>  >>  respect
> >>  >>  > the spec and therefore cdictrl behavior doesn't work and
> > both
> >>  > statements
> >>  >>  > are very compatible).
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  >>  > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>  >>  > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress
> > Blog
> >>  >>  > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> >>  >>  > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>  >>  > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > Tomitriber
> >>  >>  > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> >>  >>  > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > 2016-08-31 22:09 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek
> >>  > <gpetra...@apache.org>:
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  -1, because it still breaks
> >>  >>  >>  org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.tck.ContainerCtrlTckTest
> > (as soon as
> >>  > owb
> >>  >>  is
> >>  >>  >>  used with openejb).
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  regards,
> >>  >>  >>  gerhard
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  2016-08-30 10:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg
> >>  > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  > Good morning!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache
> >>  > OpenWebBeans-1.7.0.
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The staging repo is:
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The source release can be found at
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1017/org/apache/openwebbeans/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans/1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > My Key can be found in
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The tag in SVN is
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>  >>  openwebbeans-1.7.0/
> >>  >>  >>  > Revision r1758342
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+1] let's ship it!
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [+0] meh, don't care
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > [-1] nope, because ${blocker}
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  > txs and LieGrue,
> >>  >>  >>  > strub
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to