Without. Any generic injection is broken in any project and de are not spec compliant without that flag.
Not sure it does worth having our default for most apps but i know for very big ones it saves some boot time. Le dim. 12 août 2018 13:13, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > hmm which test is that? > > And does deltaspike break with or without the fastMatch flag? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 10.08.2018 um 14:23 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Up, > > > > just realized it affects deltaspike-data which can't inject > > EntityRepository<Entity, > > String> cause of that > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le dim. 22 avr. 2018 à 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > a > > écrit : > > > >> Oki, let me know if we can do it and I would be happy to do the change. > >> Alternatively - if we can't, maybe we should introduce that flag per jar > >> or extension potentially to enable a "mixed" app (to think if previous > >> option doesn't become possible). > >> > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >> < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >> > >> 2018-04-22 10:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > >> > >>> I'd need to do some tests. But think it's fine. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>>> Am 21.04.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >>>> > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> do we want to switch our fastMatching flag on the 2.x? (think we cant > on > >>>> 1.x) > >>>> > >>>> Rational is we would be spec compliant. I know it has some issue with > >>> the > >>>> old way to create producers without generics (or more exactly with a > >>>> wildcard) but it is not spec compliant too. > >>>> > >>>> I encounter that issue (of having the wrong default) writing an > >>> extension > >>>> where i register the exact types even for templates (Foo<X> would have > >>>> registered Foo<A>, Foo<B>, ... as needed) > >>>> > >>>> wdyt? > >>>> > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >>>> < > >>> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
