Investigated a bit more, we already have this kind of impl
(using org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver#findByParameterizedType)
but it doesn't resolve generics.
I'll check if I can enhance current logic.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le dim. 12 août 2018 à 18:33, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Cause you measured it? I have no app where it is useful once the scanning
> configured and it just breaks multiple apps OOTB and goes against CDI do we
> need a way to fix it. Can be a fastMatchUntilAmbiguous or so but we need
> sthg ;)
>
> Le dim. 12 août 2018 17:34, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> Then -1 to set it as default :D
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 12. Aug. 2018,
>> 15:36:
>>
>> > Without. Any generic injection is broken in any project and de are not
>> spec
>> > compliant without that flag.
>> >
>> > Not sure it does worth having our default for most apps but i know for
>> very
>> > big ones it saves some boot time.
>> >
>> > Le dim. 12 août 2018 13:13, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a
>> > écrit :
>> >
>> > > hmm which test is that?
>> > >
>> > > And does deltaspike break with or without the fastMatch flag?
>> > >
>> > > LieGrue,
>> > > strub
>> > >
>> > > > Am 10.08.2018 um 14:23 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > rmannibu...@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > >
>> > > > Up,
>> > > >
>> > > > just realized it affects deltaspike-data which can't inject
>> > > > EntityRepository<Entity,
>> > > > String> cause of that
>> > > >
>> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Le dim. 22 avr. 2018 à 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > a
>> > > > écrit :
>> > > >
>> > > >> Oki, let me know if we can do it and I would be happy to do the
>> > change.
>> > > >> Alternatively - if we can't, maybe we should introduce that flag
>> per
>> > jar
>> > > >> or extension potentially to enable a "mixed" app (to think if
>> previous
>> > > >> option doesn't become possible).
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> > > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> > > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > > >> <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2018-04-22 10:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid
>> >:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> I'd need to do some tests. But think it's fine.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> LieGrue,
>> > > >>> strub
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Am 21.04.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Hi guys,
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> do we want to switch our fastMatching flag on the 2.x? (think we
>> > cant
>> > > on
>> > > >>>> 1.x)
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Rational is we would be spec compliant. I know it has some issue
>> > with
>> > > >>> the
>> > > >>>> old way to create producers without generics (or more exactly
>> with a
>> > > >>>> wildcard) but it is not spec compliant too.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> I encounter that issue (of having the wrong default) writing an
>> > > >>> extension
>> > > >>>> where i register the exact types even for templates (Foo<X> would
>> > have
>> > > >>>> registered Foo<A>, Foo<B>, ... as needed)
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> wdyt?
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > > >>>> <
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to