Cause you measured it? I have no app where it is useful once the scanning configured and it just breaks multiple apps OOTB and goes against CDI do we need a way to fix it. Can be a fastMatchUntilAmbiguous or so but we need sthg ;)
Le dim. 12 août 2018 17:34, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Then -1 to set it as default :D > > > Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 12. Aug. 2018, > 15:36: > > > Without. Any generic injection is broken in any project and de are not > spec > > compliant without that flag. > > > > Not sure it does worth having our default for most apps but i know for > very > > big ones it saves some boot time. > > > > Le dim. 12 août 2018 13:13, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > > écrit : > > > > > hmm which test is that? > > > > > > And does deltaspike break with or without the fastMatch flag? > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > Am 10.08.2018 um 14:23 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > Up, > > > > > > > > just realized it affects deltaspike-data which can't inject > > > > EntityRepository<Entity, > > > > String> cause of that > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 22 avr. 2018 à 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> Oki, let me know if we can do it and I would be happy to do the > > change. > > > >> Alternatively - if we can't, maybe we should introduce that flag per > > jar > > > >> or extension potentially to enable a "mixed" app (to think if > previous > > > >> option doesn't become possible). > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >> < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > >> > > > >> 2018-04-22 10:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > >: > > > >> > > > >>> I'd need to do some tests. But think it's fine. > > > >>> > > > >>> LieGrue, > > > >>> strub > > > >>> > > > >>>> Am 21.04.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hi guys, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> do we want to switch our fastMatching flag on the 2.x? (think we > > cant > > > on > > > >>>> 1.x) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Rational is we would be spec compliant. I know it has some issue > > with > > > >>> the > > > >>>> old way to create producers without generics (or more exactly > with a > > > >>>> wildcard) but it is not spec compliant too. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I encounter that issue (of having the wrong default) writing an > > > >>> extension > > > >>>> where i register the exact types even for templates (Foo<X> would > > have > > > >>>> registered Foo<A>, Foo<B>, ... as needed) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wdyt? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >>>> < > > > >>> > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
