[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16895011#comment-16895011
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1293:
-----------------------------------------
Hi [~gr...@webtide.com], did you try to change [1] to
org.apache.webbeans.servlet.WebBeansConfigurationListener and [2] by
org.apache.webbeans.container.ManagerObjectFactory ? Then only the dependency
is to change to use openwebbeans-web. I'll not have time to have a look today
but if you have issues ping me before the end of the week, will try to help
before the holidays.
[1]
[https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.x-3804-Decoration/tests/test-webapps/test-weld-cdi-webapp/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml#L9]
[2]
[https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.x-3804-Decoration/tests/test-webapps/test-weld-cdi-webapp/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jetty-env.xml#L12]
> Update Jetty integration prior to Jetty-10 release
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-1293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Interceptor and Decorators
> Reporter: Greg Wilkins
> Priority: Major
>
> The current jetty integration relies on exposing private jetty APIs so a
> jetty Decorator can be registered. This is fragile and requires different
> APIs for the upcoming jetty-10 release.
> Instead, Jetty is developing a mechanism where a object with a decorator
> signature can be set as a context attribute and it will be introspected and
> dynamically registered as a decorator without any API dependencies.
> This is currently being developed in
> [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3838] and an integration with
> Weld is at [https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1926]
> Feedback is sought from the OpenWebBeans team on the approach and then we'd
> like to collaborate to make a similar integration.
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
