Hi Isabel, Happy to share my personal experience. My background (prior to OpenWhisk) is with ASF projects that use only the email list and occasional meetups. Overall, my assessment is that these calls are a welcome addition. I do like them, primarily because it allows to put faces to the names and make the interactions more personal. Due to conflicting meetings I can rarely attend in person, though. I catch up with the recordings – but don’t feel excluded by that (others might feel differently about this). It’s good that there are meeting notes and I do read them quickly before watching the recording. For my taste they could even be less verbose, I find them hard to follow. For me it would also work just to list the topics that were discussed. I think what remains to be true is that matters of substance that are discussed in the calls need to be transferred to the list for deeper, async discussion. From what I can tell this is happening.
My2c Michael On 11/10/17 13:15, "[email protected] on behalf of Isabel Drost-Fromm" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: On 2017-06-10 09:37, Isabel Drost-Fromm <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:48:40PM -0400, Rodric Rabbah wrote:> > Please also make sure to track the impact these sessions have on your project's reports. You've been running the video sessions plus summary for a while now. I'm really interested in a retrospective on what the impact on the community is. Do people not on the call feel like they can follow the project? Did you manage to engage new contributors through these sessions? How did you manage to incorporate feedback from those not participating? Isabel
