Hi, I agree with Micheal and I like the calls and find them useful too. I've been unable to attend a few lately much to my chagrin and have found the video and written notes great. However, I think the detail in the write up is especially helpful as it's accessible and also searchable.
Regards, Rob... > On 11 Oct 2017, at 13:46, Michael Marth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Isabel, > > Happy to share my personal experience. My background (prior to OpenWhisk) is > with ASF projects that use only the email list and occasional meetups. > Overall, my assessment is that these calls are a welcome addition. I do like > them, primarily because it allows to put faces to the names and make the > interactions more personal. > Due to conflicting meetings I can rarely attend in person, though. I catch up > with the recordings – but don’t feel excluded by that (others might feel > differently about this). > It’s good that there are meeting notes and I do read them quickly before > watching the recording. For my taste they could even be less verbose, I find > them hard to follow. For me it would also work just to list the topics that > were discussed. > I think what remains to be true is that matters of substance that are > discussed in the calls need to be transferred to the list for deeper, async > discussion. From what I can tell this is happening. > > My2c > Michael > > > On 11/10/17 13:15, "[email protected] on behalf of Isabel > Drost-Fromm" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2017-06-10 09:37, Isabel Drost-Fromm <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:48:40PM -0400, Rodric Rabbah wrote:> >> Please also make sure to track the impact these sessions have on your > project's reports. > > You've been running the video sessions plus summary for a while now. > > I'm really interested in a retrospective on what the impact on the > community is. Do people not on the call feel like they can follow the > project? Did you manage to engage new contributors through these sessions? > How did you manage to incorporate feedback from those not participating? > > > Isabel >
