> On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:48 AM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:13 +0000, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed? >> Please let me know! > > - Overall looks good, thanks. > - Couple of places I'd add an explicit "No" or "N/A" where > there's nothing to say under a template heading. > - Possibly a bit much technical detail in the project progress > section, most notably "Progress was made on [something you have > to be pretty close to the project to understand]". > And is Debian inclusion really an apache matter?
I’m somewhat torn on having all this release information on a release that’s not ASF related in any way. If it was me, I’d just focus on the work that is being done under the ASF umbrella, saying that we are working on getting the source code into the ASF repository. What google does and releases is semi-irrelevant to us as an ASF podling, no? — Leif
