Nick, Leif, thanks for the feedback. I've iterated on the draft and saved changes, hope it looks better now!
Otto On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:48 AM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 21:13 +0000, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have a draft ready for the December podling report over at: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/10kz6tIvLoZiuD9SQtYKBVB3TaUawIXc2N6-fSX5Q9eY/edit?usp=sharing > >> > >> Any thoughts? Anything that should be added / changed? > >> Please let me know! > > > > - Overall looks good, thanks. > > - Couple of places I'd add an explicit "No" or "N/A" where > > there's nothing to say under a template heading. > > - Possibly a bit much technical detail in the project progress > > section, most notably "Progress was made on [something you have > > to be pretty close to the project to understand]". > > And is Debian inclusion really an apache matter? > > > I’m somewhat torn on having all this release information on a release > that’s not ASF related in any way. If it was me, I’d just focus on the work > that is being done under the ASF umbrella, saying that we are working on > getting the source code into the ASF repository. What google does and > releases is semi-irrelevant to us as an ASF podling, no? > > — Leif > >
