Thank you for the input Antoine. I updated the PR with the latest from the document. Shall we move the discussion on the PR since that's the thing that will end up in the spec?
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/254 On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 4:36 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, I have a terminology suggestion: can we perhaps use another > name than "extension"? The reason is that we might want to an extension > type mechanism as I vaguely proposed in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9xo3mp4n23p8psmrhso5t9q899vxwfjt. > > (and the term "extension type" itself mirrors Apache Arrow > terminology) > > We could perhaps call these "Parquet protocol experiments". > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:27:11 +0200 > Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alkis, > > > > I made a couple belated comments but they are pretty minor. In general > > this looks good to me. Thank you! > > > > Regards > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:29:27 +0200 > > Alkis Evlogimenos > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hey folks. > > > > > > I want to move the extension PR > > > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/254> forward. > Unfortunately > > > the discussion was spread across the PR, other threads and documents > making > > > it slow to progress. To avoid further fragmentation I have put > together a > > > document > > > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KkoR0DjzYnLQXO-d0oRBv2k157IZU0_injqd4eV4WiI/edit > > > > > discussing the extensions mechanism in isolation. I believe the > document > > > addresses all the concerns/comments from the PR and mailing list > > > discussions brought forward so far. > > > > > > I propose we continue the discussion in the document and once > everything is > > > addressed, we finalize the PR. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
