Ha sorry, wrong ML (non binding) On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:14 PM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding). >> >> Thanks for driving this Gang! This has been a huge collaboration, across >> Parquet, Iceberg, Geo-Parquet, Sedona communities and many companies, and >> the Iceberg proposal would have not been able to make much progress >> without >> your help! I am excited to see this get closer to delivering great value >> for geospatial use cases. >> >> Szehon >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Thanks to everyone that worked on getting this update done! It's been an >> > amazing amount of discussion and I'm excited to see it ready to go. >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:11 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > I’m really looking forward to this! It’s going to be a fantastic >> addition >> > > to the community. >> > > >> > > On 2025/02/06 15:54:49 Gang Wu wrote: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > We would like to add geometry and geography logical types to >> Parquet: >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/240 >> > > > >> > > > This is proposed together with Apache Iceberg to support geospatial >> > data: >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10981 >> > > > >> > > > Two prototype implementations are available: >> > > > >> > > > 1. Parquet Java: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/2971 >> > > > 2. Parquet C++: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43977 >> > > > >> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Add these types to the format specification >> > > > [ ] +0 >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not add these types to the format specification because... >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Gang >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
