+1 (binding)


On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ha sorry, wrong ML (non binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:14 PM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding).
> >>
> >> Thanks for driving this Gang!  This has been a huge collaboration,
> across
> >> Parquet, Iceberg, Geo-Parquet, Sedona communities and many companies,
> and
> >> the Iceberg proposal would have not been able to make much progress
> >> without
> >> your help!  I am excited to see this get closer to delivering great
> value
> >> for geospatial use cases.
> >>
> >> Szehon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks to everyone that worked on getting this update done! It's been
> an
> >> > amazing amount of discussion and I'm excited to see it ready to go.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:11 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1 (non-binding)
> >> > >
> >> > > I’m really looking forward to this! It’s going to be a fantastic
> >> addition
> >> > > to the community.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 2025/02/06 15:54:49 Gang Wu wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We would like to add geometry and geography logical types to
> >> Parquet:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/240
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is proposed together with Apache Iceberg to support
> geospatial
> >> > data:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10981
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Two prototype implementations are available:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 1. Parquet Java: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/2971
> >> > > > 2. Parquet C++: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43977
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [ ] +1 Add these types to the format specification
> >> > > > [ ] +0
> >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not add these types to the format specification
> because...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Gang
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to