There still appears to be a recurring question for what exactly constitutes Parquet 2.0.
Given current implementation statuses, my suggestion is to not mention 2.0 in general. I've made a proposed changes <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535> [1] to this effect in a parquet-format repo to try to give guidance that: 1. All encodings documented can now be used regardless of page type. 2. DataPageHeaderV2 is now widely supported by readers 3. Versions should be populated with "1", but readers should accept "1" and "2". Thoughts? Does this seem like a reasonable path forward? Thanks, Micah [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
