I concur, if there's formal rules that would likely lead to release blocking, there's not much use in discussion.
So 2nd the motion. Could someone which wields the power of release shed some light on whether omitting org.apache from the java package name would be grounds for a negative vote, noting the maven org/group ID will still be org.apache.pekko? On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, 10:35 Johannes Rudolph <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 9:58 AM Jean-Luc Deprez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As a commenter in incubator general pointed out, I think there's no rule > > stipulating the reverse DNS requirement. If there's no rule, why would > > there need te be a request for an exception? > > I agree, it makes little sense to discuss this if we do not know the > rules and who will decide on which grounds. > > Since this is one of the most important points going forward somewhat > blocking further progress soon, how can be get this resolved quickly? > If there's someone who could and would veto a short package name > immediately (from the IPMCs?) then maybe let's do it right away, so we > can avoid the discussion and decision altogether. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
