> In our pekko.apache.org docs `current` and `1.0` both redirect to the
same pages. I don't see why
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/pull/271 is a
release blocker.

There is a reason why there are comments in the Pekko Connectors (i.e.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/blob/b4884fa64dac6f66e3cf758f0e42948f7202dfb9/project/plugins.sbt#L39
and
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/blob/7c04bed348f405570c7db3e4aedd063cd2fbd23f/project/Dependencies.scala#L32)
that say the version have to be in sync,
its because current will diverge over time (by definition its mutable).

> If we do block the RC1 over this then we need an RC2. We can't rewrite
history.

Is it a big problem to do this? I would actually prefer it if its in 1.0.1
for the reasons I stated. Our bottleneck is not in setting up releases,
its in getting them over the finish line and I would volunteer to step up
to do the next RC if there is a problem (I was just
really busy this week and didn't have much time to properly look over
things, next week should be a bit better).

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52 AM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:

> In our pekko.apache.org docs `current` and `1.0` both redirect to the
> same pages. I don't see why
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/pull/271 is a
> release blocker. I'm happy to have it merged but it does not affect
> real users of Pekko today. It will only affect users once we start
> releasing 1.1.x releases.
>
> If we do block the RC1 over this then we need an RC2. We can't rewrite
> history.
>
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 09:17, Matthew de Detrich
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry to do this, but there is one regression we did when setting the
> > versioning (see
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/pull/271) and I
> would
> > like to get this into the release especially considering how difficult it
> > has been to get releases out.
> >
> > It might be possible to re-trigger the vote for connectors if possible
> > since no one has voted, we would have to get INFRA to delete the
> v1.0.1-RC1
> > tag for us (since we would have to recreate the tag) but they are usually
> > very quick to do this? Otherwise we can just increment the RC (i.e.
> > v1.0.1-RC2).
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:58 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Pekko Community,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
> > > Connectors version 1.0.1-RC1.
> > >
> > > The discussion thread:
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/do5s8ro0ccz5d3o1q29ps8yx90mdofqx
> > >
> > > The release candidate:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pekko/CONNECTORS-1.0.1-RC1/
> > >
> > > This release has been signed with a *recently updated* PGP key,
> available
> > > here:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pekko/KEYS
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://pekko.apache.org/docs/pekko-connectors/current/release-notes/index.html
> > >
> > > Git branch for the release:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-connectors/tree/v1.0.1-RC1
> > > Git commit ID: b4884fa64dac6f66e3cf758f0e42948f7202dfb9
> > >
> > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > >
> > > We have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These were
> > > built with the same code
> > > as appears in this Source Release Candidate. We would appreciate if
> > > users could test with these too.
> > > If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please also
> > > notify us on this thread.
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/
> > >
> > > In sbt, you can add this resolver.
> > >
> > > resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at
> > > "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging";
> > >
> > >
> > > The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative votes
> > > and there must be a minimum of 3 approvals from Pekko PPMC members.
> > > Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please provide a
> > > list of the checks you have done?
> > > The vote will be left open until at least 15:00 UTC on 31 October 2023.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see https://pekko.apache.org/
> > >
> > > Checklist for reference:
> > >
> > > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> > > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> > > [ ] No unexpected binary files
> > > [ ] Source files have ASF headers
> > > [ ] Can compile from source
> > >
> > > To compile from the source, please refer to:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/blob/main/README.md#building-from-source
> > >
> > > Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at:
> > >
> > > https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is my +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > PJ Fanning (Apache Pekko PPMC member)
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthew de Detrich
> >
> > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> >
> > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> >
> > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin
> >
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> >
> > *m:* +491603708037
> >
> > *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

-- 

Matthew de Detrich

*Aiven Deutschland GmbH*

Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin

Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B

Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen

*m:* +491603708037

*w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]

Reply via email to