On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> actually, i'm having second thoughts about putting CONFIGURE in a
> __DATA__ section. the test.pm and CONFIGURE routine should be able to
> share data (like my %Tests = ...). we should be able to require
> thetest.pm and run the CONFIGURE if present without __DATA__ parsing /
> eval.
makes sense to me.
The only thing I'd be picky about is the naming. CONFIGURE sounds like a
good candidate for some perl reserved sub, like INIT, BEGIN, etc. Or we
shouldn't care about it, since we can always s///g?
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
