On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > The only thing I'd be picky about is the naming. CONFIGURE sounds like a
> > good candidate for some perl reserved sub, like INIT, BEGIN, etc. Or we
> > shouldn't care about it, since we can always s///g?
>
> hopefully perl will not be adding any more of those. we could prefix
> these with TEST_ or even APACHE_TEST_ to make things more clear though.
TEST_CONFIG or TEST_INIT or TEST_CONFIGURE are cool then.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
