RE: PerlRequire test + PerlConfigPerl patch

[Doug MacEachern]

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
 
> The only thing I'd be picky about is the naming. CONFIGURE sounds like a
> good candidate for some perl reserved sub, like INIT, BEGIN, etc. Or we
> shouldn't care about it, since we can always s///g?

hopefully perl will not be adding any more of those.  we could prefix
these with TEST_ or even APACHE_TEST_ to make things more clear though.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]