On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > Since in 2.0 we have the number of handlers almost doubled, do you think > that it's a good idea to advise using the triple naming, suggested by > Per Einar, as in: > > Apache::PostConfig::Whatever > > instead of: > > Apache::PostConfigWhatever
that's up to you for your examples. but i personally won't be changing to that convention. true facts that another level of namespace eat more memory and take longer to lookup, personally, i find it ugly. also, the more structures in memory the longer it will take for perl_clone() to run. both modperl use that as does threads.pm. so the argument of "memory is cheap" doesn't fly as well with threads. perhaps asking [EMAIL PROTECTED] why the module list says: "Please avoid using more than one level of nesting for module names (packages or classes within modules can, of course, use any number)." would shed more light. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
