Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>So should the guidelines suggest to use: >> >> Apache::FullPhaseNameYourModuleName >> >>for packages that fit into a single phase? > > > sure, it makes sense like the existing Apache::LogFoo, Apache::AuthFoo. > but i sure don't want to see modules named Apache::PostReadRequestFoo and > Apache::OpenLogsFoo.
so what do you want to see instead of Apache::PostReadRequestFoo and Apache::OpenLogsFoo? That's exactly why I've asked this question, as I don't know what name to give to the package for PerlOpenLogsHandler phase. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
