At 19:34 20.06.2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: >On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Since in 2.0 we have the number of handlers almost doubled, do you think > > that it's a good idea to advise using the triple naming, suggested by > > Per Einar, as in: > > > > Apache::PostConfig::Whatever > > > > instead of: > > > > Apache::PostConfigWhatever > >that's up to you for your examples. but i personally won't be changing to >that convention. true facts that another level of namespace eat more >memory and take longer to lookup, personally, i find it ugly.
I understand your position Doug, but people seemed to agree (I say "seemed" because there weren't that many replies) that we needed a better organization of the modules, and the extra '::' actually gives a better separation for the human mind :) You can see http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/skeldkendtrau for the thread. The problem is that if you oppose that (as well as Stas), there won't be any change. Do you feel really strongly about this? Because atleast for the Auth* and Log* there is "some kind" of organization now, but for the others it's mostly a mess. -- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
