Another couple that need to go into 4.4.0 release IMO are PHOENIX-1728 (Pherf - Make tests use mini cluster so that unit test run at build time) and PHOENIX-1727 (Pherf - Port shell scripts to python). Thanks, James
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks, > > James > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org > <chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's really great work James. Thanks for pointing. >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Good list, Rajeshbabu. Thanks for starting the RC process. One more of >>> note that's already in: >>> >>> - 7.5x performance improvement for non aggregate, unordered queries >>> (PHOENIX-1779). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> James >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org >>> <chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix version for the JIRA. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Rajeshbabu. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Eli Levine <elilev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Rajesh, I'm harboring hopes of getting PHOENIX-900 completed by >>> Thursday. >>> >> Hopefully it'll end up in 4.4. I'll keep you posted. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks >>> >> >>> >> Eli >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org < >>> >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on Thursday. >>> >> > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already: >>> >> > - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1) >>> >> > - Spart integration >>> >> > - Query server >>> >> > - Union All support >>> >> > - Pherf - load tester measures throughput >>> >> > - Many math and date/time buit-in functions >>> >> > - MR job to populate indexes >>> >> > - Support for 1.0.x (create new 4.4.0 branch for this) >>> >> > >>> >> > - PHOENIX-538 Support UDFs JIRA is very close. >>> >> > >>> >> > Is there any others that we should try to get in? >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> > Rajeshbabu. >>> >> > >>> >> >>>
