[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14746686#comment-14746686
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-1824:
-------------------------------------

Ah ok. I had thought you meant there were specific edge cases with certain 
properties, not just that properties get sent through properly.

bq. The properties are just key/value pairs, so hopefully this is black box as 
far as Avatica is concerned

I'd have to look at how exactly Avatica does this. I added in one property as a 
protobuf/json switch. I'd have to double check that the properties Avatica 
doesn't know about get passed.

Thanks for the extra info. It will be helpful.

> Run all IT's through Query Server
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-1824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1824
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Test
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>         Attachments: 1824.wip.patch
>
>
> Once we have PHOENIX-971 merged, we can increase our confidence in the server 
> by parameterizing our IT suite to run over either driver, or both. This will 
> probably require refactoring the IT suite out of phoenix-core/src/it into a 
> separate module so that module can depend on both phoenix-core and 
> phoenix-server modules.
> This is looking like it will also depend on improvements to Calcite that may 
> not make it into 1.2 release (as RC's for that release have already started).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to