[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225591#comment-15225591
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2628:
-----------------------------------------

Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58481927
  
    --- Diff: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/GroupedAggregateRegionObserver.java
 ---
    @@ -423,7 +426,14 @@ private RegionScanner 
scanUnordered(ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment
                             }
                         } while (hasMore && groupByCache.size() < limit);
                     }
    -            } finally {
    +            }  catch(NotServingRegionException e){
    +                if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(scan)) {
    +                    Exception cause = new 
StaleRegionBoundaryCacheException(c.getEnvironment().getRegion().getRegionInfo().getTable().getNameAsString());
    +                    throw new DoNotRetryIOException(cause.getMessage(), 
cause);
    +                } else {
    +                    throw e;
    --- End diff --
    
    Is the throw ok because the client scanner knows how to deal with this in 
cases other than local indexes? Let's doc that, please.


> Ensure split when iterating through results handled correctly
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2628
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2628
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2628-wip.patch, PHOENIX-2628.patch, 
> PHOENIX-2628_v7.patch, PHOENIX-2628_v8.patch
>
>
> We should start with a test case to ensure this works correctly, both for 
> scans and aggregates.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to