If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit from switching
to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on github.  Maybe
not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits.  Barrier of entry for
contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all.

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an urgent need
> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process and we
> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first several to
> try and solve the infrastructure problem.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to learn one or
> the
> > other if they want to work with open source projects. It might as well be
> > git, since that's where things are going.
> >
> > 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>
> >
> >> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary repo using the
> >> CouchDB project.  Other projects may be able to volunteer to join the
> >> trial, I'm not sure.
> >>
> >> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> >>
> >> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache
> >> infrastructure-dev list.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >What's the work?
> >> >
> >> >Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> >> >
> >> >On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney <
> russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that uses git?
> >> >>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It will propel the project forward.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Russell Jurney
> >> >>> twitter.com/rjurney
> >> >>> russell.jur...@gmail.com
> >> >>> datasyndrome.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion tree that
> we
> >> >>>>had
> >> >>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator projects were
> >> >>>>using
> >> >>>> git.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney
> >> >>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed.  Looking for the
> >> >>>>>tweets.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>
> >> >>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary repository.
> >> >>>>>>You
> >> >>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does.  If this has changed (or
> >> >>>>>when it
> >> >>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care which we
> use.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Alan.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can apply to
> do
> >> >>>>>>>this
> >> >>>>> via
> >> >>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first class
> citizen of
> >> >>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with pig is just
> >> >>>>>>>another
> >> >>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about on Twitter
> >> >>>>>>>and the
> >> >>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously on the
> >> >>>>>>>listserv.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter
> >> >>>>>>> Jon
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please
> email
> >> >>>>me at
> >> >>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.*
> >>
> >>
>



-- 
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com

Reply via email to