My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have git) is +1 but later.
The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated and standardized like the one with svn. I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch to svn to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad. Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my humble opinion. Cheers, -- Gianmarco On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we committed > without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight. > > No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a github > (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. > > Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior to > submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira integration. > > > > On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a problem. > > > > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. Works the > same. > > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA requires the > >> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request from > github > >> does not. > >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are experts. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit from > >>> switching > >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on github. > Maybe > >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier of entry > >>> for > >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an urgent need > >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process and we > >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first several to > >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. > >>>> > >>>> Daniel > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney < > jcove...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to learn one > >>>> or > >>>> the > >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It might as > >>>> well be > >>>>> git, since that's where things are going. > >>>>> > >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary repo using > >>>> the > >>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to join > the > >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache > >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> What's the work? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < > >>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that uses git? > >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney > >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney > >>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion tree > >>>> that > >>>> we > >>>>>>>>>> had > >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator projects > >>>> were > >>>>>>>>>> using > >>>>>>>>>> git. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney > >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking for the > >>>>>>>>>>> tweets. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary > >>>> repository. > >>>>>>>>>>>> You > >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has changed > >>>> (or > >>>>>>>>>>> when it > >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care which > >>>> we > >>>> use. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can apply > >>>> to > >>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>> via > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first class > >>>> citizen of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with pig is > >>>> just > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about on > >>>> Twitter > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously on the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please > >>>> email > >>>>>>>>>> me at > >>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>> datasyndrome.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > datasyndrome.com >
