There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we committed without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight.
No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a github (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior to submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira integration. On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney <[email protected]> wrote: > That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a problem. > > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. Works the same. > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA requires the >> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request from github >> does not. >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are experts. >> >> >> >> >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit from >>> switching >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on github. Maybe >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier of entry >>> for >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an urgent need >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process and we >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first several to >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to learn one >>>> or >>>> the >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It might as >>>> well be >>>>> git, since that's where things are going. >>>>> >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary repo using >>>> the >>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to join the >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the work? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that uses git? >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion tree >>>> that >>>> we >>>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator projects >>>> were >>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>> git. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking for the >>>>>>>>>>> tweets. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected] >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary >>>> repository. >>>>>>>>>>>> You >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has changed >>>> (or >>>>>>>>>>> when it >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care which >>>> we >>>> use. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can apply >>>> to >>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> via >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first class >>>> citizen of >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with pig is >>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about on >>>> Twitter >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please >>>> email >>>>>>>>>> me at >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] going forward.* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [email protected] >>> datasyndrome.com >> >> > > > -- > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [email protected] datasyndrome.com
