Not meant to be divisive but a recognition the separation between focus, needs and economics often creates an intentional gap or a temporary gap but needs to fulfilled to meet specific end-user needs.
Never assumed it was going sour. Tension and issues are never inherently bad but just trade-offs on gaps and planning points to "consumers" of core libraries like pivot. I can see, however, where the word tension in this context may have implied something negative. Thanks for allowing me to clarify my comments. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Brown [mailto:gkbr...@mac.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:32 AM To: dev@pivot.apache.org Subject: Re: Pivot components & the keyboard > I think this is a classic tension between people > like us and the core library team. No offense meant, but this comes across as a bit divisive. There hasn't even been any real discussion of this issue yet - why would you assume that there would be tension? I'm not saying there won't be any disagreement about approach (to this issue or others like it), but I'd suggest that we actually have the discussion before assuming that it is going to go sour. ;-)
