Based on two previous rounds of testing (and verifying that the
artifacts haven't changed):
First set of tests done (on 2013-04-07):
- Verified the text RAT reports
- Compared SVN tags/2.0.3 with current branches/2.0.x contents.
- Downloaded .tar.gz and .zip files and verified MD5 and SHA-1 checksums
- Untar the sources and compare to current SVN "branches/2.0.x"
- Build (using "ant") the sources to verify no errors (using Java
1.6.0_43 on OSX)
- Check the generated Javadoc (selected pages)
- Check the Javadoc generated from source vs. Javadoc packaged in the
binary distribution:
* Some non-date differences noted in the following files:
- index-all.html
- package-tree.html
- class-use/Dictionary.html
- class-use/Group.html
- class-use/List.ItemIterator.html
- and some others
* I'm going to discount these as due to slightly different JDK
versions used
- Verify the correct version number in the README file
- Quick verify of the fixed bugs in RELEASE-NOTES
- Untar the binary distribution, unjar the files and verify selected
files same as the source .class build
- Plug the binary distribution files into our application and verified
correct operation of a number of things
Second set of tests done (on 2013-06-03):
* System is OSX 10.6.8, JDK 1.6.0_45 (x86_64)
* Download all .zip and .tar.gz files, check MD5 checksums.
* Compare contents of .zip files with contents of .tar.gz files and
verified they are identical.
* Run "clean", "package", "doc", "test" targets on both source
directories.
* Tested .jar files built from source with our application.
* Tested binary .jar files with our application.
* Browsed Javadoc in all four locations (generated from source
directories and from shipped binary files).
* Browsed text RAT reports.
* Compared 2.0.3 tag with current branches/2.0.x code and found only
expected differences.
* Compare both source downloads with contents of tags/2.0.3 and verified
they are identical.
So my vote is:
[ X ] +1 Publish
~Roger Whitcomb
-----Original Message-----
From: Sandro Martini [mailto:sandro.mart...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:49 AM
To: dev@pivot.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pivot 2.0.3 - Round 4
Hi All,
the Pivot 2.0.3 release candidate has been tagged, packaged, and is
ready for a vote.
The artifacts, RAT reports, and KEYS file can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_release/
Note that just for convenience there are even Maven bundles for
installing them in a real Maven Repository:
http://people.apache.org/~smartini/pivot-2.0.3_maven/
The tag from which the release artifacts were generated can be found
here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/tags/2.0.3/
In addition, my PGP public code signing key can be found at the MIT key
server (http://pgp.mit.edu/), but just for convenience that key is even
here:
http://people.apache.org/~smartini/F9EDAF10.asc , and
smartini_apache.asc is only a copy of it with a better name.
Please vote to publish this release by Wednesday , July 31 at 23:00 GMT.
Note that voting may conclude early if people have the time to look
earlier (but in any case, minimum 72 hours).
Remember that the Apache Voting Process requires a minimum of 3 Bindings
+1 vote for the release to be successful (see the "Votes on Package
Release"
paragraph).
In your vote, please include the testing you performed to arrive at your
vote.
[ ] +1 Publish
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Don't publish
Thanks,
Sandro
